Custom Query (184 matches)
Results (1 - 3 of 184)
|#1627||invalid||Now Ready For Sparks Your Muscle Into Growth With GMAX Natural Supplement|
For many years, the weak have reason to believe that they have to train longer to build big muscles. The reality, I found almost the opposite. Skinny guys really need to train less and, of course, eat more.
It's just an art in itself. I touched on it earlier this year in his article "Five tips for better bulk." So let's talk about training. In my experience, the weak should approach building muscle mass as they approach to receive zagar.Chto? Stay with me.
Think of it this way: Exposure to sunlight produces a tan. Ultraviolet radiation of sunlight on the skin stimulates melanocytes produce melanin more as a defense mechanism, thus darkening the skin. The brighter the sun, the intensity of the radiation, and the greater the incentive for melanocytes. But even when the stimulus is ideal, the tan does not happen overnight. This occurs with the passage of time.
The same situation occurs when you expose your body to exercise stress. The higher the voltage, that is, there will be more incentive for the super compensation. The key is to find the sweet spot on the intensity, ie, the percentage of 1RM. In short, we will light our muscles in muscle growth, and not force them.
LOOKING minimum effective dose Our bodies are amazingly adaptable. This means they are able to perform miracles, but it also means they have a strong incentive to make big changes. So as you can be out during cloudy day, no more tanned, you can spend all day in the gym and not see any noticeable muscle growth.
Furthermore, our bodies also have a limit of how stress and the sun, which can operate for a certain period of time. A certain amount of ultraviolet radiation, at certain doses, produce a beautiful tan. Going beyond this point, and the skin is damaged, resulting in a burn.
Similarly, at some point during intense training effort creates the potential for a new size, strength and endurance. Moreover, this will lead to exhaustion. In the short term, that may put you at risk for injury. Stretch out for a few weeks, and you can push to overtraining when your body is trying to recover from the intense demands that have been placed on it several times.
Remember, the training effect is the effect treninga.Trenirovochny desired goal can be anything relative strength increases, muscle growth, muscle hypertrophy or "functional" strength. But the effect of training do not feel up to recover from training.
To continue the metaphor, if so in five minutes, your body needs time to recover from the fact that five minutes before exposing fit 10 minutes. Similarly, if the bench press 4 sets of maximum weight almost 225 pounds, for example, with 2 minutes rest, you need to relax a bit before you can bench press 230 lbs 4 sets of 2 minute break. Failure to meet these requirements recovery can make you feel-and-be weaker, not stronger. http://gmaxreclameaqui.com/
|#1575||wontfix||Rewrite xmonad in Java|
There are many problems with first-class functions -- they cannot be compared for equality, serialized etc. This makes a lot of inconveniences for xmonad developers, some of these problems were discussed on the mailing list recently. I think the most obvious solution is to rewrite xmonad in a language which does not support first-order functions. Although it's not trivial to find such language, I think I did -- something called Java.
Now, you ask, why do I propose this project for Haskell.org? Well, there's no such mentoring organization as Java.com (or even com.java). Besides, there's apparent profit for the Haskell community. It is well-known that xmonad serves as the source of many new Haskellers. First they search for a usable window manager, then they find one and must learn a whole language to configure it, then they like the language and start use it. Surely this doesn't help avoiding success at all cost.
xmonad users will also benefit from such rewrite. I haven't decided yet whether new xmonad config will be in Java itself or in XML. In the first case, we have an ability to use a lot of design patterns there, which makes it easier for users to get familiar with configuration (because, you know, today everyone knows design patterns). In the second case we don't need a Java compiler to be installed, and since XML is standard there are many editors there which make XML editing easy and straightforward. But in either case it will be more readable than current conglomeration of combinators.
Finally, I don't think we need that frightening name "xmonad" any more. How about "xfactoryfactory"?
The project would involve adding such facilities to the plot library, and then (if possible) creating a sample app to demonstrate these features.
How it helps: As there are no free alternatives to mathematica, this feature which can be very beneficial for mathematical analysis is still not available for free. Such an application will aid mathematical analysis and help students and professionals all over the world.
NOTE: I am interested in doing this project and would like for someone experienced to provide difficulty estimates. Also, it would be nice to know if there is anyone willing to mentor this project.