Changes between Version 51 and Version 52 of Records


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 23, 2012 12:19:34 AM (3 years ago)
Author:
GregWeber
Comment:

add other languages section

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Records

    v51 v52  
    9191
    9292
     93=== Other (FP) languages ===
     94
     95If you know of other relevant language implementations, please add them!
     96
     97[http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~benl/papers/thesis/lippmeier-impure-world.pdf thesis] section 2.7 - 2.7.4 pages 115 - 119
     98
     99The Opa language (functional, focused on web development) states that its modules are a special case of records.
     100
     101The Agda language [http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php?n=ReferenceManual.Records generates a module (name space) for each record and also allows a record, like any module to be placed into the global scope by the programmer (opened in Agada terms)].
     102
     103Other FP languages where I looked for a record implementation but it appeared they have no solution for records with the same fields (my information could be wrong/out-dated) ocaml, oz. However, the O in OCaml is for objects, and objects have structural typing that supports abstraction over fields.
     104
     105I couldn't find great specific information on record implementation ML variants. Best I can tell, SML does not allow records in the same module with the same field. Records from other modules require name-spacing or must be opened up similar to Agda. SML# supports [http://www.pllab.riec.tohoku.ac.jp/smlsharp/?FeatureRecordPolymorphism abstraction over fields] as per the overloaded records implementation.
     106
     107[http://roy.brianmckenna.org/ Roy], a functional language that targets only javascript, also has structural typing which prevents clashes and allows abstraction over fields.