Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Records/DeclaredOverloadedRecordFields/NoMonoRecordFields


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 21, 2012 2:45:53 AM (3 years ago)
Author:
guest
Comment:

Add link to corresponding trac ticket.

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Records/DeclaredOverloadedRecordFields/NoMonoRecordFields

    v3 v4  
    22== No Mono Record Fields ==
    33
    4 This proposal is a precursor to overloaded record fields. It's also a modest step towards freeing up the namespace, without in any way pre-judging how the 'narrow namespace issue' might get addressed.
     4This proposal is a precursor to overloaded record fields. It's also a modest step towards freeing up the namespace, without in any way pre-judging how the 'narrow namespace issue' might get addressed. Ticket #5972.
    55
    66
     
    2121
    2222See also thread starting: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-January/021433.html (and continuing through February), which initially considers nested modules as an approach for namespacing.
    23 
    2423
    2524=== Import/Export and Representation hiding ===