Changes between Version 38 and Version 39 of ExtensibleRecords


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 5, 2009 10:35:27 PM (5 years ago)
Author:
gidyn
Comment:

see also

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ExtensibleRecords

    v38 v39  
    163163}}} 
    164164 
    165  
    166  = How to proceed? = 
     165= How to proceed? = 
    167166 
    168167There are a lot of design decisions listed on this page, some of which inspire strongly-help opinions. It is clear that discussion will not resolve these, and we don't seem to have a lot of examples to help clarify matters. The deadlock is unchanged: we still have too many good ideas. 
     
    177176Libraries could then implement {{{mkUnderlyingRecord}}}, {{{underlyingEmptyRecord}}}, {{{MkUnderlyingRecord}}}, {{{UnderlyingEmptyRecord}}}, {{{viewUnderlyingRecord}}}  and {{{viewUnderlyingEmptyRecord}}} in whatever way is best. What do you think? 
    178177 
     178= See Also = 
     179 
     180 * [http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Extensible_record HaskellWiki] 
     181 * [http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/FirstClassLabels Haskell']