Changes between Version 37 and Version 38 of ExtensibleRecords


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 8, 2008 10:41:25 AM (7 years ago)
Author:
guest
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ExtensibleRecords

    v37 v38  
    11= Extensible Records = 
    22 
    3 There seems to be widespread agreement that the current situation with regards to records is [http://bloggablea.wordpress.com/2007/04/24/haskell-records-considered-grungy/ unacceptable], but the [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC:FAQ#Does_GHC_implement_any_kind_of_extensible_records.3F official GHC policy] is that there are too many good ideas to choose from - so nothing gets done! 
     3There seems to be widespread agreement that the current situation with regards to records is [http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/2007/04/24/haskell-records-considered-grungy/ unacceptable], but the [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC:FAQ#Does_GHC_implement_any_kind_of_extensible_records.3F official GHC policy] is that there are too many good ideas to choose from - so nothing gets done! 
    44 
    55The purpose of this page is to collect and discuss proposals for adding extensible records to GHC. Ticketed at #1872.