Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of ExplicitCallStack


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 15, 2006 10:56:40 AM (7 years ago)
Author:
simonpj
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ExplicitCallStack

    v7 v8  
    11= Maintaining an explicit call stack = 
    22 
    3 There has been a vigorous thread on error attribution ("I get a `head []` error; but who called `head`?").  This page summarises some half baked ideas that Simon and I have been discussing. Do by all means edit this page to add comments and further ideas or pointers.  (As usual, ''discussion'' is best done by email; but this page could be a place to record ideas, design alternatives, list pros and cons etc.) 
     3There has been a vigorous thread on error attribution ("I get a `head []` error; but who called `head`?").  This page summarises some half baked ideas that Simon and I have been discussing. Do by all means edit this page to add comments and further ideas or pointers.  (As usual, ''discussion'' is best done by email; but this page could be a place to record ideas, design alternatives, list pros and cons, pointers to related work etc.) 
    44 
    55See also 
    66  * [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-November/019549.html The Haskell cafe thread] 
    77  * [http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/loch.html] 
     8  * [http://haskell.org/hat HAT] 
    89 
    910