Version 18 (modified by chak, 5 years ago) (diff) |
---|

# The VECTORISE pragma

The vectoriser needs to know about all types and functions whose vectorised variants are directly implemented by the DPH library (instead of generated by the vectoriser), and it needs to know what the vectorised versions are. That is the purpose of the `VECTORISE` pragma (which comes in in number of flavours).

## The basic VECTORISE pragma for values

Given a function `f`, the vectoriser generates a vectorised version `f_v`, which comprises the original, scalar version of the function and a second version lifted into array space. The lifted version operates on arrays of inputs and produces arrays of results in one parallel computation. The original function name is, then, rebound to use the scalar version referred to by `f_v`. This differs from the original in that it uses vectorised versions for any embedded parallel array computations.

However, if a variable `f` is accompanied by a pragma of the form

{-# VECTORISE f = e #-}

then the vectoriser defines `f_v = e` and refrains from rebinding `f`. This implies that for `f :: t`, `e`'s type is the `t` vectorised (in particular), `e`'s type uses the array closure type `(:->)` instead of the vanilla function space `(->)`. The vectoriser checks that `e` has the appropriate type.

**Caveat:** Currently, the type is indeed checked by the vectoriser by comparing Core types. It would be better to perform that check in the type checker to instantiate the type of `f_v` appropriately if it is overly general. At the moment, the vectorised version of `t` and the inferred type of `e` need to exactly match up (including all dictionaries *and their order*).

## The NOVECTORISE pragma for values

If a variable `f` is accompanied by a pragma

{-# NOVECTORISE f #-}

then it is ignored by the vectoriser — i.e., no function `f_v` is generated and `f` is left untouched.

**Caveat:** If `f`'s definition contains bindings that are being floated to the toplevel, those bindings will still be vectorised.

## The VECTORISE SCALAR pragma for functions

Functions that contain no array computations, especially if they are cheap (such as `(+)`), should not be vectorised, but applied by simply mapping them over an array. This could be achieved by using the `VECTORISE` pragma with an appropriate right-hand side, but leads to repetitive code that we rather like the compiler to generate.

If a unary function `f` is accompanied by a pragma

{-# VECTORISE SCALAR f #-}

then the vectoriser generates

f_v = closure1 f (scalar_map f)

and keeps `f` unchanged.

For a binary function, it generates

f_v = closure2 f (scalar_zipWith f)

for a tertiary function, it generates

f_v = closure3 f (scalar_zipWith3 f)

and so on. (The variable `f` must have a proper function type.)

## The basic VECTORISE pragma for type constructors

### Without right-hand side

For a type constructor `T`, the pragma

{-# VECTORISE type T #-}

indicates that the type `T` should be vectorised and embeds no parallel arrays. This is similar to where the vectoriser automatically decides to vectorise a type, but but no special vectorised representation needs to be generated as the type embeds no arrays.

The data type constructor `T` that together with its constructors `Cn` may be used in vectorised code, where `T` and the `Cn` represent themselves in vectorised code. An example is the treatment of 'Bool'. 'Bool' together with 'False' and 'True' may appear in vectorised code and they remain unchanged by vectorisation. (There is no need for a special representation as the values cannot embed any arrays.)

The type constructor `T` must be in scope, but it may be imported. 'PData' and 'PRepr' instances are automatically generated by the vectoriser.

**TODO**

- Do we need to be able to specify that an imported type embedding arrays should be vectorised including the generation of a specialised right-hand side?

### With right-hand side

{-# VECTORISE type T = ty #-}

**TODO**

- This isn't fully implemented yet. (Implemented up to and including desugaring and being put into
`ModGuts`, but not used in the vectoriser.)

## The VECTORISE SCALAR pragma for type constructors

For a type constructor `T`, the pragma

{-# VECTORISE SCALAR type T #-}

indicates that the type is scalar; i.e., it has no embedded arrays. Note that the type cannot be parameterised (as we could not rule out that any of the type parameters at a usage site is an array type.)

Due to this pragma declaration, `T` that may be used in vectorised code, where `T` represents itself. However, the representation of `T` is opaque in vectorised code. An example is the treatment of `Int`. `Int`s can be used in vectorised code and remain unchanged by vectorisation. However, the representation of `Int` by the `I#` data constructor wrapping an `Int#` is not exposed in vectorised code. Instead, computations involving the representation need to be confined to scalar code.

The type constructor `T` must be in scope, but it may be imported. The `PData` and `PRepr` instances for `T` need to be manually defined. (For types that the vectoriser automatically determines that they don't need a vectorised version, instances for `PData` and `PRepr` are still generated automatically.)

**TODO**

- For type constructors identified with this pragma, can we generate an
`instance`of the`Scalar`type class automatically (instead of relying on it being in the library)?