Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of Commentary/Compiler/IntegratedCodeGen

Jun 4, 2008 4:56:11 PM (7 years ago)



  • Commentary/Compiler/IntegratedCodeGen

    v6 v7  
    9  0. Stg -> Cmm: Converts to a flat representation of C--.
    10  0. Cmm -> ZGraphCmm<stack slots, compile-time constants>:
     9 0. Convert from STG to a flat representation of C--: Stg -> Cmm
     10 0. Build control-flow graph: Cmm -> ZGraphCmm<stack slots, compile-time constants>
    1111  * Converts the flat representation to a control-flow graph, with Cmm statements representing instructions in the basic blocks.
    1212  * Implements calling conventions for call, jump, and return instructions: all parameter passing is turned into data-movement instructions (register-to-register move, load, or store), and stack-pointer adjustments are inserted. After this point, calls, returns, and jumps are just control-transfer instructions -- the parameter passing has been compiled away.
    1313  * How do we refer to locations on the stack when we haven't laid it out yet? The compiler names a stack slot using the idea of a "late compile-time constant," which is just a symbolic constant that will be replaced with an actual stack offset when the stack layout is chosen.
     14 0. Code expansion (instruction selection): ZGraph Cmm<stack slots, compile-time constants> -> ZGraph Instrs<stack slots, compile-time constants>
     15  * Expands each Cmm instruction into a series of instructions. The representation of an instruction can be chosen by the back end. In some compilers (vpo, gcc, QC--), machine instructions are represented using RTLs. But Machine SUIF uses a target-specific, abstract representation that must satisfy a well-defined interface (i.e. by using a typeclass). It would be nice to support both.
     16 0. Optimizer: ZGraph Instrs<stack slots, compile-time constants> -> ZGraph Instrs<stack slots, compile-time constants>
     18Implicit in this pipeline:
     19 * Besides the expander, (parts of) the optimizer, and the code emitter, the rest of the passes should work on any chosen representation of instructions. Typeclasses are our friends.