Opened 4 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#5526 closed bug (fixed)

Please document UnboxedTypes pragma

Reported by: Lemming Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: Documentation Version: 7.2.1
Keywords: Cc: ghc@…
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown Test Case:
Blocked By: Blocking:
Related Tickets: Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page:


GHC-7.2.1 warns about option -fglasgow-exts being removed in future. However, the doc says, that unboxed types syntax is enabled by this option. Can you please mention LANGUAGE UnboxedTuples in ?

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by simonpj@…

commit ec436fefbc3e35fc2e558184b4b0b98cec78eeb6

Author: Simon Peyton Jones <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Oct 4 11:47:44 2011 +0100

    Remove unnecessary references to -fglagow-exts
    replacing them by the appropriate flag.
    Suggested by Trac #5526.

 docs/users_guide/flags.xml        |    2 +-
 docs/users_guide/ghci.xml         |   11 ++++++-----
 docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml |   14 +++++---------
 docs/users_guide/runghc.xml       |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by simonpj

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Good idea, thanks -- done.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.