id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,priority,milestone,component,version,resolution,keywords,cc,os,architecture,failure,difficulty,testcase,blockedby,blocking,related
1902,"Restrict the type of (^), (^^), and add genericPower, genericPower'",igloo,,"This got a warm reception when I mentioned it in http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2007-June/027557.html so I'm formally proposing it now.
Note that this is a divergence from Haskell 98 (but the libraries already have a handful of small divergences, and Haskell' is just around the corner...).
In my opinion, `(^)` has the wrong type. Just as we have, for example,
{{{
(!!) :: [a] -> Int -> a
genericIndex :: (Integral b) => [a] -> b -> a
}}}
we should also have
{{{
(^) :: (Num a) => a -> Int -> a
genericPower :: (Num a, Integral b) => a -> b -> a
}}}
(or some other function name). The same goes for `(^^)` (`genericPower'`).
In my experience this would remove 99.9% of all defaulting (mostly where you write things like `x^12` and `8^12`), which means it's easier to get `-Wall` clean without having to put `:: Int` annotations everywhere.
The impact to GHC's bootlibs and extralibs is minimal. In most cases we have things like `2^15`, where Int is clearly fine, although it happens to be defaulted to Integer currently. In `Data.Complex` we have 2 cases of `e^(2::Int)` which can now be beautified. There are several cases where the type is inferred to be `Int` anyway.
There are 3 files where we really do have an Integer, and it does matter. They are all for parsing numbers of the form 18e43, in `base/Text/Read/Lex.hs`, `parsec/Text/ParserCombinators/Parsec/Token.hs` and `haskell-src/Language/Haskell/Lexer.hs`.
Initial deadline: 1 Dec 2007.
",proposal,closed,normal,Not GHC,libraries/base,6.8.1,wontfix,,,Unknown/Multiple,Unknown/Multiple,,Unknown,,,,