Efficient Map <-> Set conversions
We should be able to convert a Set into a Map without re-computation of the tree Shape. (initially proposed by John Meacham)
- Show closed items
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- jpbernardy changed weight to 5
changed weight to 5
- jpbernardy added Tfeature request Trac import core libraries labels
added Tfeature request Trac import core libraries labels
- jpbernardy changed the description
changed the description
- Author
- Author
This requires to move the tree structures to another module, so Set and Map can both see the structure.
Providing, toTree and "unsafeFromTree" would allow the user to implement his own algorithms.
- Author
This requires moving the raw tree types to their own module so Map can see Set structure and vice-versa. Note that this will be given for free if we move to A. Hey's AVL trees.
- Author
This ticket is resolved for the new AVL-based types.
- jpbernardy assigned to @trac-jpbernardy
assigned to @trac-jpbernardy
Trac metadata
Trac field Value Test case - → N/A - Simon Marlow changed milestone to %Not GHC
changed milestone to %Not GHC
- Ian Lynagh <igloo@earth.li> closed
closed
The conversion functions should be proposed with the library submissions process: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Library_submissions
Trac metadata
Trac field Value Resolution Unresolved → ResolvedWon'tFix - Developer
Trac metadata
Trac field Value Architecture Unknown → Unknown/Multiple - Developer
Trac metadata
Trac field Value Operating system Unknown → Unknown/Multiple - Thomas Miedema mentioned in commit bcfae08c
mentioned in commit bcfae08c
- Ben Gamari added Pnormal label
added Pnormal label