GHC matches -- as a varsym when lexing a qvarsym
GHC seems only to exclude the line comment marker --
when lexing a varsym and not a qvarsym.
This can be observed in the following code
module Demo where
x Demo.-- y = (x,y)
Generating this surprising error message
/Users/emertens/Desktop/Demo.hs:3:3: error:
Qualified name in binding position: Demo.--
and excludes this definition perhaps?
example f = Just.-- comment
f
Which might either have lexed as Just
.
-- comment
, or it might have lexed as Just.-
-
, but it probably shouldn't be the case that it's a qvarsym.
At a minimum, the Haskell Report specifically excludes --
from the varsym rule, so it can't support the qvarsym rule match that it is now.
Trac metadata
Trac field | Value |
---|---|
Version | 8.2.1 |
Type | Bug |
TypeOfFailure | OtherFailure |
Priority | normal |
Resolution | Unresolved |
Component | Compiler (Parser) |
Test case | |
Differential revisions | |
BlockedBy | |
Related | |
Blocking | |
CC | |
Operating system | |
Architecture |